Deck

Ginkgo Bioworks · DNA · NYSE

Ginkgo Bioworks operates synthetic biology foundries that engineer custom microbes for pharma, agriculture, and industrial customers, charging research-service fees plus downstream value share. Its biosecurity arm was divested for equity in April 2026.

$8.93
Price
$583M
Market cap
$170M
Revenue (FY25)
$423M
Cash
De-SPAC'd Sep-2021 at split-adjusted $487; peaked $597 one month later; bottomed $5 in Sep-2024; now $8.93 — roughly 98% below the all-time high.
2 · The variant view

The $423M cash pile looks like a floor — strip the claims against it and barely $50M survives.

  • $417M of convertible notes mature in 2027. The strike sits far above $8.93, so refinancing — not conversion — is the path. The window opens late 2026 and will be negotiated from weakness.
  • $47M of cash is already restricted by a PNNL surety bond locked until roughly 2029. Usable cash drops to about $375M before any FY26 spend.
  • FY26 cash-burn guide is $125–150M, with a $54M annual excess-lease drag baked into opex. After one year of burn and honoring the converts, unencumbered cash compresses to a low-double-digit-million figure.
On this arithmetic the equity floor sits closer to $2–3 once the 2027 converts and locked cash are honored — not the $7-plus the consensus net-cash narrative implies.
3 · The collapse

Revenue is shrinking faster than the cash burn, and Q1 just printed the worst quarter since 2020.

$19.5M
Q1 FY26 revenue -49% YoY
$170M
FY25 revenue down from $478M peak FY22
-$179M
FY25 free cash flow capex slashed 88%
Cell Engineering segment profitable years, ever

Cell Engineering — the segment that is supposed to be the business — has never produced a profitable year in seven years of public disclosure. The lower cash burn is bought with deferred maintenance: capex collapsed to $7.7M last year, just 0.13× depreciation. On the Q4 call management withdrew FY26 revenue guidance entirely and replaced it with a cash-burn target.

4 · The revenue isn't what it looks like

When customers walked away, the accounting recognized the unspent contracts as revenue.

  • 22% of FY24 revenue — $49.9M — came from non-cash deferred-revenue releases on terminated programs (Motif $45.4M plus a related-party $4.5M). FY25 added another $7.5M from BiomEdit. The customer is gone; the GAAP line item arrived anyway.
  • Three Programs KPIs were discontinued in Q4 FY24 — the exact quarter they inflected down. New Programs had already dropped from 78 (FY23) to 52 (FY24). Disclosure stopped before the next decline could be measured.
  • $17.75M securities settlement in Dec-2024 (Bernstein v. Ginkgo, N.D. Cal., final approval 13-Dec-2024) and a $4.125M insurance-funded derivative settlement noticed in Aug-2025 with three-year corporate-governance reforms. The SEC inquiry from October 2021 was closed with no recommendation of enforcement per the FY2025 10-K; the DOJ informal inquiry from Nov-2021 has no public update.
Ginkgo's own 10-K names customer in-house R&D as its #1 competitor — not the listed peers.
5 · Founders sold at the lows

Weeks after FY25 mega-grants vested, the founder circle sold into a 52-week low.

  • April 9–10, 2026: coordinated Form 4 sales at $6.40–6.93 from CEO Kelly (~$1.37M on 206,782 shares) and from the co-founder/spouse pair Shetty and Canton (~$978K of jointly-held shares, reported on each spouse's Form 4). CFO Coen separately sold ~$215K on April 13–17. Standard analyst datasets did not flag the cluster.
  • The trigger was the vest. Kelly's stock-award compensation jumped from $0 in FY23 to $5.45M in FY25; Shetty's went from $0 to $3.22M. Vest, then sell into a 52-week low. Stock-based comp ran roughly 48% of FY25 revenue.
  • Dual-class control compounds the alignment problem. Founders plus co-founder Che hold roughly 58% of the vote on under 20% of the economics. Independent Chair Shyam Sankar leaves at the 2026 AGM. Board member Sri Kosuri runs Octant Bio — a competing private synthetic-biology firm — with no public recusal policy.
6 · The peers prove TechBio works

Every named TechBio peer grew revenue in FY25. DNA shrank 32% and is alone in contraction.

+160%
ABCL revenue growth FY25
+23%
Schrödinger growth turned FCF-positive at $12M
+20%
Twist revenue growth gross margin 25% → 51% (FY21–25)
-32%
DNA revenue growth FCF margin -105%, second-worst in cohort

Schrödinger and Twist are the proof points that a TechBio platform can self-fund and can scale gross margin from a starting base similar to Ginkgo's. Ginkgo has done neither. Ten of the top 20–30 pharma have touched the platform per management, but no top-10 commercial Datapoints anchor has been disclosed — the slide from research-service revenue to durable repeat-revenue has not been demonstrated.

7 · Bull & Bear

Lean cautious — the 2027 convert refinancing will set the price, not the platform story.

  • For. $423M of gross cash against a $583M market cap is real optionality if Cell Engineering revenue stabilizes anywhere near consensus.
  • For. Commercial Datapoints channels are live with AWS Bio Discovery, Benchling, and Tamarind. Nebula automation scales from 50 to 100+ racks in 2026, and the biosecurity divestiture closed April 3, 2026, refocusing the story on one business.
  • Against. Q1 FY26 came in at $19.5M. The FY26 consensus near $160M requires four near-doubled quarters in a row — a pace DNA has never produced in seven years.
  • Against. $417M of converts must be refinanced from a $583M market cap with revenue shrinking and founders selling at the lows. The discount window will dictate terms — coupon, equity component, dilution — not the platform pitch.
Bear scenario near $3.50 (about 61% downside) on 1.5× revenue against $130–150M FY26 with dilution to roughly 75M shares post-refi. Watch for a flip on: a named top-10 pharma anchor on Datapoints and Q2 Cell Engineering revenue above $30M.

Watchlist to re-rate: Q2 FY26 earnings on or about Aug-6 (consensus implies near-doubling from Q1); the 2027 convert refinancing terms in Q4-2026/Q1-2027; further Form 4 activity from the founder group.